Last week Le Monde published an interview with philosopher Paul Virilio, conducted by Gérard Courtois and Michel Guerrin, where he discusses his viewpoints on the recent global financial crisis within the greater framework of his theories concerning speed, technological progress, and accidents. A translation of this interview is now available in English. See below for a few excerpts.
For thirty years now, the phenomenon of History accelerating has been negated, together with the fact that this acceleration has been the prime cause of the proliferation of major accidents. Freud said it, speaking of death: "accumulation snuffs out the perception of contingency". Contingency is the key word here. These accidents are not contingent occurrences. For the time being, the prevalent opinion is that researching the crash of the stock exchange as a political and economic issue and in terms of its social consequences is adequate enough. But it is impossible to understand what is going on if one does not implement a (policy based on the) political economy of speed, the speed that technological progress engenders, and if one does not link (this policy) to the 'accidental' character of History...
Let's take just one example: the dictum "time is money". I add to this, and the stock exchange testify to it: "speed is power". We have moved from the stage of the acceleration of History to that of the acceleration of the Real. This is what 'the progress' is: a consensual sacrifice.
The crash is not the Black Death, there haven't been millions of victims, and it's not the 11th of September either. We are not talking death here, save maybe a few suicides. The victims are somewhere else to be found.
Where did the current crisis stem from? the answer is: subprime mortgages; housing credit that proved unsustainable; land. The victims are the hundred of thousands of people who are going to lose their homes. The whole concept of sedentarism had already been challenged by immigrants, exiles, deportations, refugees - and the delocalisation of economic activities. This phenomenon is bound to increase. Till 2040, one billion people will have to move out from their their residence. Those are the victims. We are in the realm of "stop/eject". People are arrested, get expelled.
Recession has finally hit America and it already caused loss of jobs to millions of people since December of 2007. With this situation we must find ways on how to cope up with the present situation. Home business sounds like a great idea for a lot of people. Home business is how people used to make their living centuries ago - not many people used to work solely at an office - and these days, after suffering a layoff, it may seem like the way to go. You may even be able to start your business with a payday loan or an installment loan. No boss to worry about. You can dictate hours, and even better, dress code. If your interaction with customers takes place by phone or e-mail, customers won’t be able to tell that you aren’t wearing pants. Not to mention the incentives - in a normal job, if you increase profits, you don’t get any benefits from it. However, if you start a <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/03/11/installment-loans-start-home-business/">home business</a>, you will.
I couldn't agree more with the premise of this article. I work in the financial services sector and I can see that neither government nor industry is considering the accelerated warp produced by the speed that technology is adding to the equation of the business cycle.
The new - and unknown - technology-induced market forces need a serious review for the good of all concerned, government, industry, and consumers.
The population (in general) hasn't realized the wallop these new market forces have introduced into our lives. The business cycle and the ever-accelerating push of technology is something that affects us all.
I advice small companies that are looking for growth and need to raise capital. I'm frequently asked "Is this the right time to do this?" Of course, the previous question goes begging for an answer because the econometric models that served for such a long time, don't work anymore.
Private Placements, raising capital
people really need to learn how to open a savings account and learn how interest can work for them or against them. The banks know most people don't have this knowledge and they take advantage, neither the comsumers or lenders can be blamed they are both guilty of greed