CALL FOR PAPERS: (IM)POSSIBILITY

Graduate Student Conference
Department of Film and Visual Studies
Harvard University
April 9–10, 2020

(Im)possibility marks a limit of available information, a threshold of representation, a cessation of action. Thinking at the limits of the possible gives rise to a specific set of issues: how might we articulate that which cannot be said? How might we orient ourselves toward that for which no available theory or representation is adequate?

While it is primarily thought of as an exception, impossibility is in fact ubiquitous and our relationship to it intimate. To demonstrate the omnipresence of the impossible, some might look toward contemporary political crises, saying that current conditions are untenable. Others might point to ecological destruction, noting that human life itself may soon become an impossibility. So integrated is this limit into the fabric of daily life that it has become commonplace in contemporary discourse to claim that the impossible can no longer be called—at least in any straightforward sense—unlivable.

Indeed, Black studies theorist Frank B. Wilderson III would respond that the category of “humanity” has always rendered some lives impossible—that the very concept of the human constructs Blackness as a site of nonbeing subject to, and of, perpetual extraction, gratuitous violence, and social death.

Alexander Kluge writes that cinema is the single medium capable of capturing “the impossible moment”—a moment that couldn’t be imagined beforehand, and which can never be repeated again. Cinema and digital media enable us to glimpse other realms of (im)possibility—realms in which the impossible can manifest as fiction, simulation, speculation, or absurdity. Outside the bounds of continuous space and time, the (im)possible might circulate here: not the world as it is, but the world as we might make it.

Or, perhaps cinema and digital media—despite all their promises to collapse traditional hierarchies and think otherwise—give rise to new structural, technological, and epistemological impossibilities. Digital media rely on that which is impossible to comprehend: data made illegible in code, information flows too large or too fast to grasp. No single spectator can configure themselves as the subject of such information.

We don’t have to choose: (im)possibility is given in the shared periphery of a futural, idealized dimension and a present, negative dimension. It lays waste to current frameworks, concepts, and worlds while offering insight from beyond the break. (Im)possibility beckons as a radical promise because it endures as an impassive present, and one of the challenges of the contemporary moment might be to hold those two modalities together. How might we consider the impossible itself as anything other than a negative concept—an index of failure? What might we articulate about (im)possibility without, for all that, rendering it (as another) possible?

This conference aims to foster an environment of exchange and discussion amongst a diverse set of participants across fields that include, but are not limited to, film and media studies; the histories of science, technology, and computing; the history of art and architecture; and visual culture. We invite proposals for scholarly papers, audio-visual presentations, aural installations, exploratory writing, and performances that engage with, as well as extend beyond, the areas listed below. Please submit abstracts (no longer than 300 words), together with a short biographical note, to fvsconference@gmail.com by January 15, 2020. Presenters will be notified in late February 2020.

Afro-pessimism
Anthropocene
Anaxagora
Apocalypse
Apophatic theology
Atmosphere
Being (of Nothingness)
Black cinema
Blackness
Borders
Climate change
Colonialism
Conspiracy
Crisis
Deep time
Ecology
Epistemological limits
Fiction
Fugitivity
Gnosis
Hidden infrastructures
(Im)possibility
(In)visibility
Migration
Negation
Negativity
Non-anthropocentric intensities
Non-philosophy
(Non)sensuousness
Opacity
Pessimism
Queer (non)sociality
Representation and its limits
Sabotage
States of exception
Surveillance
Terra Nullius
The end of Galileo’s visibility postulate
Thirdness/the neutral
Unintelligibility
Utopia