← Back

discussion

Posted Dec. 8 2009 05:57

subject-ness

hi playful folks,

would like to generate a discussion.

http://pump.org.in/arch/essay

thanks,
judsoN

Stone Dec. 8 2009 13:05Reply

Note much of a comment, but gets the ball rolling: Overall, I love it. The quality of some images is distractingly shoddy.

Stone Dec. 8 2009 13:06Reply

"Not" not "note"!

judsone Dec. 8 2009 13:20Reply

i gladly note much comment, whether you intended it or not. thanks a bunch.

fifi Dec. 8 2009 14:03Reply

I completely disagree!! u need to re-read your Marx.

stubby5 Dec. 8 2009 14:11Reply

This paper is clearly researched and makes a strong point. However, on one small point, our interpretations diverge. Does Foucault actually imply "moustache" when he talks about decorative artifice? it is a fine point, to be sure, but i tend to believe the conservative view.

martin Dec. 8 2009 14:14Reply

Mustached men are pretty common among Foucault's circle. It would be reasonable to assume, he was speaking otherwise.

John Dough Dec. 8 2009 14:43Reply

[img]http://arunrajagopal.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/big-world3.jpg[/img]

This section pulls together conversation across the Rhizome site. Comments on announcements and editorial posts appear alongside discussion threads. By aggregating different conversations under a single section, we hope to create a growing and lively environment for discussion. We encourage critical and thoughtful engagement in this section. Participants who use this forum to slander other users, post advertisements, or abuse the forum will be blocked by the Rhizome staff. We appreciate your understanding.

regex Dec. 8 2009 14:19Reply

Judson,
Thank you. Having studied linguistics a great deal, I appreciated "World Interacting with Thought-communication: Speech" but was curious if you claim to be the author? The copywright information indicates otherwise.
-R.+

judsoN Dec. 8 2009 14:35Reply

check again

Joe Mafandone Dec. 8 2009 14:30Reply

I've shown at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC, created a piece with the Brooklyn Philharmonic and composer Eve Beglarian at the Brooklyn Museum, for an interactive show at the Queens Museum. [img]http://www.clamlynch.com/blog/images/river_log.jpg[/img]

Joe Mafandone Dec. 8 2009 14:38Reply

[size=200][/size]Whether their words will alter the political dynamic on this critical issue remains to be seen. [img]http://www.savingadvice.com/images/blog/shopping-mall-1.jpg[/img] [size=150]Super warehouse sale on super soft eco-chic line of clothing, including loungewear and lingerie![/size][size=200][/size]

fantum Dec. 8 2009 14:55Reply

this is really dumb

Stone Grether Dec. 8 2009 14:58Reply

Now if you could just incorporate it with my title generator at http://morgangrether.info/everything/always/academia then all would be right in the world.

pam d Dec. 8 2009 15:00Reply

this has got to be the worst thing on the web EVER!!!

judsoN Dec. 8 2009 15:02Reply

Thanks. At least it's the best of something.

marcy b Dec. 8 2009 15:04Reply

why

wind Dec. 8 2009 15:28Reply

…

DJ CLIPBOARD Dec. 8 2009 15:36Reply

Critical theory is the examination and critique of society and culture, drawing from knowledge across the social sciences and humanities. The term has two quite different meanings with different origins and histories, one originating in social theory (particularly in 20th century Marxist and anti-positivist sociology) and the other in literary criticism.

Though until recently these two meanings had little to do with each other, since the 1970s there has been some overlap between these disciplines. This has led to "critical theory" becoming an umbrella term for an array of theories in English-speaking academia. This article focuses primarily on the differences and similarities between the two senses of the term critical theory.

Joe Mafandone Dec. 8 2009 15:45Reply

[size=25]When the going gets tough. The tough get going.[/size]
[img]http://www.picresorts.com/en/Guam/images/ac.jpg[/img]

Erika Lincoln Dec. 16 2009 10:15Reply

http://www.localheroesrestaurants.com/images/Giver2010.jpg

Erika Lincoln Dec. 16 2009 10:16Reply

[img]http://www.localheroesrestaurants.com/images/Giver2010.jpg[/img]

mr squiggles Dec. 8 2009 15:57Reply

This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.

mrs. squiggles Dec. 8 2009 16:49Reply

add the URL of the image, highlight the whole URL, then hit the image botton. i don't know why it wasn't working before, but seems to be fine now.

[img]http://janedark.com/Marx.jpg[/img]

erik sanner Dec. 9 2009 15:30Reply

"As an advocate of the Big Mac Aesthetic, I feel that the mechanical mark-making of the biomorphic forms endangers the devious simplicity of the remarkable handling of ljght."

step 1:
http://www.random.org/

step 2:
http://www.pixmaven.com/phrase_generator.html

Eve Beglarian Dec. 15 2009 20:40Reply

"Who magnificently interacts with our sexuality, regardless, who stops marginalizedly?"

Who, indeed?