Patrick Tresset wrote: > It is a shame that all the Charlie discussion prevented commenting on this work > which is entertaining, clever and simple
there is something similar between jacksonpollock.org and your work:
quote: "The goal is for the final system to mimic the process developed by the artist, rather than aiming at results exactly reproducing his way of drawing a portrait. Nevertheless, the produced sketches are in the style of the artist." (http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aikon/wp/?page_id=2)
Both works are directly linked to activities made by hands in a world with some physical laws (gravity and liquids for pollock, hand on paper with a pencil for aikon (?) ). They are ''entertaining'' because they let us think about experiences we already had in other context, not on a computer connected to the net. From my point of view, this is a new 'manierism' (technique and artifice, imitation) allowed by technology.
Thanks interesting comment. I have always liked "manierism". Yet both jacksonpollock.org and AIKON production don't try to hide the fact that they are done / generated with a computer. The artifacts generated are of a style only possible with a computer. I have tried to imitate AIKON's production by hand, well I can't but it is an interesting "dialog".
ARN <info@x-arn.org> wrote: Patrick Tresset wrote: > It is a shame that all the Charlie discussion prevented commenting on this work > which is entertaining, clever and simple
there is something similar between jacksonpollock.org and your work:
quote: "The goal is for the final system to mimic the process developed by the artist, rather than aiming at results exactly reproducing his way of drawing a portrait. Nevertheless, the produced sketches are in the style of the artist." (http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aikon/wp/?page_id=2)
Both works are directly linked to activities made by hands in a world with some physical laws (gravity and liquids for pollock, hand on paper with a pencil for aikon (?) ). They are ''entertaining'' because they let us think about experiences we already had in other context, not on a computer connected to the net. From my point of view, this is a new 'manierism' (technique and artifice, imitation) allowed by technology.
It is a shame that all the Charlie discussion prevented commenting on this work
which is entertaining, clever and simple
Patrick
Vijay Pattisapu <lexicontrol@gmail.com> wrote: http://www.jacksonpollock.org/
Patrick Tresset wrote:
> It is a shame that all the Charlie discussion prevented commenting on this work
> which is entertaining, clever and simple
there is something similar between jacksonpollock.org and your work:
quote: "The goal is for the final system to mimic the process developed by
the artist, rather than aiming at results exactly reproducing his way of
drawing a portrait. Nevertheless, the produced sketches are in the style of
the artist." (http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aikon/wp/?page_id=2)
Both works are directly linked to activities made by hands in a world with
some physical laws (gravity and liquids for pollock, hand on paper with a
pencil for aikon (?) ). They are ''entertaining'' because they let us think
about experiences we already had in other context, not on a computer
connected to the net. From my point of view, this is a new 'manierism'
(technique and artifice, imitation) allowed by technology.
Thanks
interesting comment. I have always liked "manierism". Yet both
jacksonpollock.org and AIKON production don't try to hide the fact that they are done / generated with a computer. The artifacts generated are of a style only possible with a computer. I have tried to imitate AIKON's production by hand, well I can't but it is an interesting "dialog".
ARN <info@x-arn.org> wrote: Patrick Tresset wrote:
> It is a shame that all the Charlie discussion prevented commenting on this work
> which is entertaining, clever and simple
there is something similar between jacksonpollock.org and your work:
quote: "The goal is for the final system to mimic the process developed by
the artist, rather than aiming at results exactly reproducing his way of
drawing a portrait. Nevertheless, the produced sketches are in the style of
the artist." (http://doc.gold.ac.uk/aikon/wp/?page_id=2)
Both works are directly linked to activities made by hands in a world with
some physical laws (gravity and liquids for pollock, hand on paper with a
pencil for aikon (?) ). They are ''entertaining'' because they let us think
about experiences we already had in other context, not on a computer
connected to the net. From my point of view, this is a new 'manierism'
(technique and artifice, imitation) allowed by technology.
+
-> post: list@rhizome.org
-> questions: info@rhizome.org
-> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
-> give: http://rhizome.org/support
+
Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php