Dear Curt Cloninger,

"We aim to flood the commodified market of the implemented concept with unimplemented concepts, thus critiquing and "devaluing" the implemented concept."

I am unsure as to how such material would "critique" so-called "implemented" concepts, particularly if the only difference between an "implemented" and an "unimplemented" concept was the act of implementation!

To me, what you're suggesting actually sounds like advertising. A smart ad exec comes up with endless ideas and ultimately implements very few of them. Those ideas which go unimplemented don't really "critique" the ones that make it to fruition, do they?

I would argue that context is very important here. Couldn't it be argued that the Web itself, particularly all of its passionate Lefty bloggers and opiners, already churns out an endless stream of unimplemented ideas on a daily basis? If you're going to deploy inaction as a strategy, you have to make it VISIBLE; I would say that to critique a given situation or institution, an inaction has to RESIST something that is being expected.

DQ