Article on one of this year's Loebner Prize entries.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?storyV3078
Jabberwacky:
http://www.jabberwacky.com/
Article on one of this year's Loebner Prize entries.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?storyV3078
Jabberwacky:
http://www.jabberwacky.com/
>Jabberwacky:
>http://www.jabberwacky.com/
the first exchange it gave even worse replies. all in all, if the
person administering the test thinks this program is convincing, that
must conversely prove the questioner is a machine.
Jabberwacky: Are you warm?
User: It's actually my back that hurts.
Jabberwacky: I see. Do you like skiing?
User: Do you in this condition?
Jabberwacky: Why do you think you had a choice?
User: Of body parts?
Jabberwacky: Bob too.
it's better than most of these AI conversationalists at answering
really silly replies (takes a lot longer), but referring
(inexplicitly) to even the sentence before, confuses it.