Jo-Anne Green wrote:
> I find myself feeling reluctant to see Joywar continue.
I too think that Joywar was a fantastic show of ingenuity and solidarity,
and that perhaps our work is done here. I'm not interested in turning it
into a bloodfest. We're artists, not insurgents.
My original feeling stands: that lawsuits–objections to sampling–of
this kind are not meritorious, that they are ignorant and rooted in fear,
that they cramp and discourage creativity, that they belong to an old,
dead world. My worries were met with a fantastic, positive creative
onslaught. Clearly we are all on pretty much the same page. Thanks to
everyone for your creative input, and for your friendship ('cause I was
really freaked-out. thanx, I feel less so now).
I think the main thing was that this "problem" was turned
into a locus of creativity. It's important not to lie down and be a
doormat everytime your principles are challenged. We *are* living at the
forefront of a strange and exciting creative revolution. It seems slow
and weird (it is) but taken as a whole, it's exciting. call it growing
pains. I really don't believe I've done anything wrong by making this
painting from a found image. There is nothing immoral about doing what I
do. I will continue to sample media images and news photographs. I have a
big new project on the front burner. And it's great when your community
supports you.
How cool is that? Let's move on now.
(If something else bad happens, believe me you'll be the first to know).
So in the meantime,
yours in virtuosity –
Agent.Joy
HI Joy
just so that we can be clear, are you saying you'd
like us to take the mirrors/works down now?
I've grown quite attached to my contribution and I'm a
bit reluctant to bin it -plus I'd certainly like to
keep my links page to others' work intact with perhaps
a little reworking of the editorial -as you say, cause
aside, there's some nice work.
Obviously if you feel really strongly here then I for
one will do whatever you wish but it would be a shame
to see the "remix" pieces go, I think.
best
michael
— Joy Garnett <joyeria@walrus.com> wrote:
> Jo-Anne Green wrote:
>
> > I find myself feeling reluctant to see Joywar
> continue.
>
> I too think that Joywar was a fantastic show of
> ingenuity and solidarity,
> and that perhaps our work is done here. I'm not
> interested in turning it
> into a bloodfest. We're artists, not insurgents.
>
> My original feeling stands: that
> lawsuits–objections to sampling–of
> this kind are not meritorious, that they are
> ignorant and rooted in fear,
> that they cramp and discourage creativity, that they
> belong to an old,
> dead world. My worries were met with a fantastic,
> positive creative
> onslaught. Clearly we are all on pretty much the
> same page. Thanks to
> everyone for your creative input, and for your
> friendship ('cause I was
> really freaked-out. thanx, I feel less so now).
>
> I think the main thing was that this "problem" was
> turned
> into a locus of creativity. It's important not to
> lie down and be a
> doormat everytime your principles are challenged. We
> *are* living at the
> forefront of a strange and exciting creative
> revolution. It seems slow
> and weird (it is) but taken as a whole, it's
> exciting. call it growing
> pains. I really don't believe I've done anything
> wrong by making this
> painting from a found image. There is nothing
> immoral about doing what I
> do. I will continue to sample media images and news
> photographs. I have a
> big new project on the front burner. And it's great
> when your community
> supports you.
>
> How cool is that? Let's move on now.
>
> (If something else bad happens, believe me you'll be
> the first to know).
>
> So in the meantime,
> yours in virtuosity –
> Agent.Joy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
> http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is
> open to non-members
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
> out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at
http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
hi Michael,
I don't think it's necessary to remove any of this artwork – I just meant
that we should move on to the next project/s now. I think as a whole it's
pretty damn cool.
I don't think the discussion is "over" either –
best,
J
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Michael Szpakowski wrote:
> HI Joy
> just so that we can be clear, are you saying you'd
> like us to take the mirrors/works down now?
> I've grown quite attached to my contribution and I'm a
> bit reluctant to bin it -plus I'd certainly like to
> keep my links page to others' work intact with perhaps
> a little reworking of the editorial -as you say, cause
> aside, there's some nice work.
> Obviously if you feel really strongly here then I for
> one will do whatever you wish but it would be a shame
> to see the "remix" pieces go, I think.
> best
> michael
> — Joy Garnett <joyeria@walrus.com> wrote:
> > Jo-Anne Green wrote:
> >
> > > I find myself feeling reluctant to see Joywar
> > continue.
> >
> > I too think that Joywar was a fantastic show of
> > ingenuity and solidarity,
> > and that perhaps our work is done here. I'm not
> > interested in turning it
> > into a bloodfest. We're artists, not insurgents.
> >
> > My original feeling stands: that
> > lawsuits–objections to sampling–of
> > this kind are not meritorious, that they are
> > ignorant and rooted in fear,
> > that they cramp and discourage creativity, that they
> > belong to an old,
> > dead world. My worries were met with a fantastic,
> > positive creative
> > onslaught. Clearly we are all on pretty much the
> > same page. Thanks to
> > everyone for your creative input, and for your
> > friendship ('cause I was
> > really freaked-out. thanx, I feel less so now).
> >
> > I think the main thing was that this "problem" was
> > turned
> > into a locus of creativity. It's important not to
> > lie down and be a
> > doormat everytime your principles are challenged. We
> > *are* living at the
> > forefront of a strange and exciting creative
> > revolution. It seems slow
> > and weird (it is) but taken as a whole, it's
> > exciting. call it growing
> > pains. I really don't believe I've done anything
> > wrong by making this
> > painting from a found image. There is nothing
> > immoral about doing what I
> > do. I will continue to sample media images and news
> > photographs. I have a
> > big new project on the front burner. And it's great
> > when your community
> > supports you.
> >
> > How cool is that? Let's move on now.
> >
> > (If something else bad happens, believe me you'll be
> > the first to know).
> >
> > So in the meantime,
> > yours in virtuosity –
> > Agent.Joy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > +
> > -> post: list@rhizome.org
> > -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> > -> subscribe/unsubscribe:
> > http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> > -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> > -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is
> > open to non-members
> > +
> > Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set
> > out in the
> > Membership Agreement available online at
> http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> +
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> -> visit: on Fridays the Rhizome.org web site is open to non-members
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>