hi – i am trying to understand how the collapse of the economy
affected the exhibition possibilities for net artists. my thesis is
that besides a slew of museums +orgs, tate, whitney. sfmoma, sarai,
eyebeam, physical exhibition spaces have been limited (i mean places
where art is consumed socially, in groups – not private consumption at
the home cpu). what to people think? what places come to mind? i live
in new york, and don't travel much so i really appreciate the input.
thanks, rachel
> hi – i am trying to understand how the collapse of the economy
> affected the exhibition possibilities for net artists. my thesis is
> that besides a slew of museums +orgs, tate, whitney. sfmoma, sarai,
> eyebeam, physical exhibition spaces have been limited (i mean places
> where art is consumed socially, in groups – not private consumption at
> the home cpu). what to people think? what places come to mind? i live
> in new york, and don't travel much so i really appreciate the input.
> thanks, rachel
Well, I am inbetween projects, so as people noticed, I have been posting
more than ever, sorry if I run thin in the near future…
for now, as I am living in Los Angeles, I will say that there are two major
events that keep Lalaland going. The first would be AIM (Art in Motion):
http://www.usc.edu/dept/matrix/aim/aimIV/
and the second would be LA Freewaves: http://freewaves.org/newSplash.htm
Both of these events already finished their programming so it would be hard
to tell how the economy will affect them next year. So, perhaps what I
mentioned to Marc Garrett in a previous thread might be completely different
next year:
"This is hard to claim these days, as the current state of art making is
extremely conservative. Even New Media is really trying to work within the
traditional art system. "
(http://rhizome.org/thread.rhiz?thread'09&text681#18681 )
Connecting your thesis to what I mentioned to Marc Garrett in the above
thread, I think I should rephrase the idea of being conservative. It would
be hard for me to make such a claim globally, but I think that it would be
safe to say that it is through non-profits that most people online are able
to understand the role of net art. After all we need a hub, no? I will
here share a list I developed for Net Art Review. You will notice that, if
one searches on Yahoo or google or whatever other engine, these
organizations are what one will get more or less – though I will admit that
a good number of them have been submitted by the institutions themselves.
So maybe net art is not meant to be shared in a physical space. I, for one,
feel odd to go to exhibits featuring online work, when that work should be
experienced in the privacy of the home. This is why I think Turbulence
rocks! (look below, need one say more – take at will.)
With all respect.
Eduardo N.
New Media Fix List follows updated weekly at http://www.netartreview.net:
::newMedia\_fix::
Please notify us of any important organizations that should be included in
the "New Media Fix."
##
[2003 net-art links] [391.org]
Aa
[AcousticSpaceLab] [afterrhizome] [agent.netart.org] [AIM] [aleph-arts]
[alternativemuseum.org] [amoda] [arsElectronica] [arslab] [artedigitalcuba]
[artexe.com] [artelinkado.com] [arteonline.arq.br] [Arte.Red]
[artfutura.org] [artistsunion] [artnetweb.com] [artmedia.manimonides]
[artnode.dk] [artofficial-online.com] [ArtontheNet] [artport]
[art.teleportacia.org] [asci.org] [a-virtual-memorial.org]
Bb
[bannerart.org] [bbcdigitalarts] [betacity.de] [biome] [boringart.com]
[bostoncyberarts.org]
Cc
[c3.hu] [CCA Glasgow] [centrepompidou.fr] [centrepompidou.fr/evenements]
[chairetmetal.com] [chambreblanche.gc.ca] [ciudadinterior.com/hypermedia]
[computerfinearts.com] [cream.artcriticism.org] [creativetime.org] [crumb]
[ctheory.net] [the-cyber-kitchen.com] [cyborgfestival.com]
Dd
[da2.org] [dam.org] [deaf.v2.nl] [de-lete.tv] [deluxe-arts.org]
[diacenter.org]
[dian-network] [digitalcraft.org] [digital visions][digicult.org]
[digitalpocketgallery]
Ee
[empyre] [engage.nu] [e-valencia.org] [extropy.org] [eyebeam.org]
Ff
[file.org.br] [film-philosophy.com] [fineartforum] [fluxusonline.com]
[franklinfurnace.org] [freemanifesta.org] [frontwheeldrive.com]
[furtherfield.org] [FR:fwd]
Gg
[gallery9.walkerart.org] [Guerrilla Performance Locator]
[genderchangers.org]
Hh
[harvestworks.org] [Histories of Internet Art] [horizonzero]
Ii
[imma] [intelligentagent.com] [interacces.org] [InteractivA01] [intima.org]
[irational.org] [iuoma.org] [iuoma mail group]
Jj
[javamuseum.org]
Kk
[kanonmedia.com]
Ll
[lemusseedivisioniste.org] [limbO.org] [linkoln.net] [ljudmila.org] [low-fi]
Mm
[maccsi.org] [maap.org.au] [mediamanics.com] [mediascot.org] [msu.su/wwwart]
[mediacentre] [michelethursz.com] [mobilegaze.com] [mocaDigital]
[museotamayo.org/inmerso]
Nn
[net-art.org] [noemalab.com] [nomadnet.org/] [netartconnexion]
[netartlatino] [nettime.org] [newcat.org] [newsgrist] [newmediafest.org]
[netzwissenschaft] [neural.it] [n5m4.org] [ntticc.or.jp/]
[nydigitalsalon.org]
Oo
—————————-
Pp
[pixelpress.org] [pogogallery] [postmedia]
Qq
—————————-
Rr
[random.exibart.com] [rhizome.org] [runme.org]
Ss
[senef.com] [sfmoma.org] [Sharp Talk][soundtoys.net] [springerin.at/en]
[squat.net/ascii] [stasisfield.com] [stasisfield.com/space] [stunned.org]
[switch\_journal]
Tt
[tactical media] [teknokultura] [theredproject.com] [turbulence.org]
[tate.org.uk/netart] [the5k.org] [thing.net]
Uu
—————————-
Vv
[v2.nl] [virose.pt] [virtualmigrants.com] [verybusy.org]
Ww
[webbyawards.com] [webnetmuseum.org] [worldwidereview.com]
Xx
—————————-
Yy
[year01.com]
Zz
—————————-