Emil Lahteenmaki wrote:
> There's continuity editing, montage,… What would you suggest as a
> specific term for film editing in new media? When the consumer is the
> final editor and actual editor's job is to determine beforehand in
> what ways the consumer can access to the material.
>
> I've come up with something like "pre-programmed editing"/"programmed
> editing". I thought you were the right people to suggest better ones.
> I'd use it in my research.
>
> Emil Lahteenmaki
> Film Student
you pose an interesting question, emil. regardless of whether content can be accessed randomly by the end user, the bias of selection and placement still lies with the 'author' so to speak. some sequence does persist. in designing objects that can be compared in odd juxtopositions maybe it is apt to refer to the designer as a composer of memes, a memist or somesuch relationship to the imparting of ideas through tangental means. the means that we give the user access to our ideas is a replication of our perspective - how they use it may differ from our intentions depending on how strict the codes for interaction are. some ideas .. id like to know more about what you think ..
rupauk
Hi – Not sure about the terminology, though I'm sure it's discussed in
a thorough way in Manovich's Language of New Media, which very much
uses cinematic idioms in relation to new media. I suggest looking at
the "idiomorphic" software of Barabra Lattanzi. wildernesspuppets is
her domain… and 'idiomorphic" is her self-styled term for her
cinema-derived editing applications. Her 10 or so freeware applications
are on her site… Rachel
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 11:33 PM, Rupauk wrote:
> Emil Lahteenmaki wrote:
>
>> There's continuity editing, montage,… What would you suggest as a
>> specific term for film editing in new media? When the consumer is the
>> final editor and actual editor's job is to determine beforehand in
>> what ways the consumer can access to the material.
>>
>> I've come up with something like "pre-programmed editing"/"programmed
>> editing". I thought you were the right people to suggest better ones.
>> I'd use it in my research.
>>
>> Emil Lahteenmaki
>> Film Student
>
> you pose an interesting question, emil. regardless of whether content
> can be accessed randomly by the end user, the bias of selection and
> placement still lies with the 'author' so to speak. some sequence
> does persist. in designing objects that can be compared in odd
> juxtopositions maybe it is apt to refer to the designer as a composer
> of memes, a memist or somesuch relationship to the imparting of ideas
> through tangental means. the means that we give the user access to
> our ideas is a replication of our perspective - how they use it may
> differ from our intentions depending on how strict the codes for
> interaction are. some ideas .. id like to know more about what you
> think ..
>
> rupauk
> + ti esrever dna ti pilf nwod gniht ym tup
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>