Hi Doron,

I kind of find it a sort of contradiction that it is a 'Webby award' (not
just the title) yet people have to pay up to join, so to be chosen.

So, those who do not pay are not included, therefore it is not a real
interpretation of the best sites on the Internet, it is mainly based on
(suppozedly) the best who apllied. So whats the point of having the webby
awards?

marc




>
> To view this entire thread, click here:
> http://rhizome.org/thread.rhiz?threadf13&text798#16798
>
> + + +
>
> http://www.webbyawards.com/main/webby_awards/nominees.html#net_art
>
> Andy Deck-Art Context
> http://artcontext.org/
>
> BlinkenLights
> http://www.blinkenlights.de
>
> Listening Post
> http://www.earstudio.com/projects/listeningPost.html
>
> NYC Surveillance Camera Players
> http://www.notbored.org/the-scp.html
>
> PuppetTool
> http://www.lecielestbleu.com/puppettool
>
> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
>
>

On Thursday, Apr 10, 2003, at 10:01 America/New_York, marc.garrett
wrote:
> So whats the point of having the webby
> awards?
>

Obviously, to make money ;-)

/Liza

thanx Liz…

you filled in the rest…for me

marc



>
> On Thursday, Apr 10, 2003, at 10:01 America/New_York, marc.garrett
> wrote:
> > So whats the point of having the webby
> > awards?
> >
>
> Obviously, to make money ;-)
>
> /Liza
>
>