maybe it's that everybody has a conscious version of a beginning and an end because that's how we define ourselves
roles
personalities
nationalities
biology
happinesssadness
etc
perhaps related to nietzsche's reverse-history projection stuff… things don't happen a to b to c…rather, we see c and pro-ject a and b. ie we are constantly faced with immediate experience, yet, like the dead, we are constantly speaking from
roles
personalities
nationalities
biology
happinesssadness
which are all defined by history/personal experience

like a comic, one sees frame a and frame and projects a closure between the two…there is a floating C somewhere that is never drawn or printed, but fabricated by consciousness

there is a second projection, one of reader into the cartoon character, in the "masking effect," a *vertical* closure, if you will

that projection-of-closure may be the definition of consciousness, God, etc..

…maybe it's all trivial, and there are infinitely many putative "closure axes" and not just a "2.Moksha"

vijay


>Reply-To: <husain@cyber.net.pk>
> "S Yasir Husain" <husain@cyber.net.pk> "'Vijay Pattisapu'" <disco@junglist.com> RE: RHIZOME\_RAW: installment three in 2moDate: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 18:37:40 -0800
>
>
>
>a nice spiral
>we live with (have) many well-believed versions (stories, cartoons) of
>beginnings and ends, in some of which they (b's & e's)sometimes dont
>exist. no origin/s. no end/s. in others, they meet. sometimes in
>patterns! in some they dont. some people live without a (have no)
>conscious version of an e or b, like 'dead' dna I suppose.
>
>schizoi[d]na yasir
>
>
>
>
>
>—–Original Message—–
>From: owner-list@rhizome.org [mailto:owner-list@rhizome.org] On Behalf
>Of Vijay Pattisapu
>Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2003 7:38 PM
>To: list@rhizome.org
>Subject: RHIZOME\_RAW: installment three in 2mo
>
>
>installment three
>
>Perhaps a better articulation of 2.Moksha: a series of experiences is
>synthesized into a principle. The behavior of the former can be thought
>of as 'immediate experience