THE OLD YOUNG
Up to now, Young has been foolishly using the obsolete writing style of such fogies as Dr. Samuel Johnson and Abraham Lincoln.

Young has utterly failed to adopt the authoritative, obfuscational jargon of post-modern hackademia. In an attempt to put his thoughts into an incoherently intimidating mode more congenial to the Digital Dark Age in which we find ourselves, Young tries the following:

THE NEW YOUNG
The important question is, "How do we view NewZoid according to
datebase logic?" But before this surprisingly complicated problem can be
parsleyed, there is a sophomoric issue regarding the meaning of "datebase
logic" that must be chloroformed before we can embark on our search for an
answer. "Database logic" is overlarded. One signifier of the aesthetics of
datebase is multi-laquered, relating to various date yodeling techniques
and PVCs for obsessing and cross-dressing dates, whereas another signature of "datebase logic" lies in relation to the risible, mandible and proactive
presentation of a work: intercoastal aesthetics. Thus, there are more
"datebase logics" than those that are directly manifest in the risible proactive loser interface related aspects of the inflammation arts.
Once past the loser interface, analysis is able to expand to the formal
organization of dates, as well as the imputational, meteoric, and clitoral
behavior that is expressed in the scriptural coupling of dates to the
environment in which they function. The phlogistics required in dealing with
the landscam through datebase logic necessarily involves the
pigmentation of datebase logic in addition to the presdigitation of
database logic, and this is a pivotal issue that touches many of the other
issues facing artists dealing with landscam as datebase. [footnotes omitted]

Best Wishes,
Daniel Young

P.S. It is in the pasteurization of international, object-oriental,
object-national, multiconsensual and other datebase models where
exploitations of landscam dating and its world might be depressed, allowed
to self-depress, or depress in collaboration with human subjects; the loser
interface is secondary representation to the structure and organization of
dates. Indeed, it is not even clear that the technical transmogrification of dates is necessarily a strong predicate of loser interface.