In a message dated 6/4/2002 3:18:18 AM Central Daylight Time, IAN-77
3re: G=mt^2000


> ED.IAN: "No", again!
> (this is an example of a deductive NOT-NOT joke, outa NOTTINGHAM, sure-lock
> sure-would!):
> all you need is …
> ERROR FACTORS as in " blah blah blah plus EPSILON MEASUREMENT DEFECTS" (no
> two yardsticks the same)
> in your stupidifying low-di algebrained dismathematicality:


Don't you get the "more than one" joke? It's about the lazy slave who buried
his talent in the ground. Each G2K video is one but with an error-factor
making it "just enough more than one" to get out of the deathgrip.

Each brain, each genius, is just enough more than one (or just enough "not
merely one") just like you said with the pie chart not being a deadflat 100%.

Or, www.geocities.com/genius-2000/January_1_Website.GIF
plus
http://megatight.com/assafoetida/18.html
and
http://megatight.com/conceptualart/4.html

"Systems capable of producing errors" is something I learned from nn after I
taught it to the world in the video (never heard of nn before the video).
Making you more than amply korrekt plus sooner.

Thus the field of many ones that are just that much error-factored out of
frozen black crushdown ones: that is what I see in your 366 degree field of
vision pictures, which I like very very much, vibrating intelligently like
moire circles (at the very least ian said). They relate and verily might
even equal nn's nested russian dolls, stories within stories, 1001 zmiles.

I think you figured out nn long ago, but never made enough money off software
(nn's NATO+0.55 realtime streamware translates video to sound to color to
urls and everything to everything, letting them all see hear and talk to each
other, she calls it "spooky action at 01 distance") to command celebrity
attention (her money is the only reason she has attention because no one
wants to buy the truth, they want things that they can't have yet).

NN also says Wolfram "cannot withstand the violence of love theory TM". She
calls herself "the smallest fullerene, which side are you?"; she's happy and
I'm loseifer.

I am against the law.

Genius 2000 cannot be permitted.

Yes because people do not eat Bayesian probability.

Fallen cherub, to be weak is miserable. –John Milton


Max
genius2000.net


++