Why Karei is Worthless
My mind goes back to a girl I knew some years ago, who told me "Hold on
loosely but don't let go. If you cling too tightly you're gonna lose
control." Your baby needs someone to believe in, and a whole lotta space to
breathe in.
So for those who wonder if Karei and I are friends, he can can go hard to
fucking hell. Express elevator goin' down.
He had to take back his assertion that "Madonna is powerful." So, if you
want him to suffer, stick that in his face.
Max Herman
genius2000.net
++
>From: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
>Reply-To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>
>To: <list@rhizome.org>
>CC: <thingist@BBS.THING.NET>
>Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: this one is for marc.garrett
>Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 10:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
>
>[mostly, but also for Wally Wanker, Peter von Messiah (aka Lightning Rod
>Man), and Joseph (aren't we all Con(vincing)-men)]
>
>There's never a way
>And there's never a day
>To convince people
>You can play their game
>You can say their name
>But you won't convince people
>There's several ways
>There's several ways
>To convince people
>Now you're people
>And we're people
>We've got to be
>To convince people
>It's the name of the game
>It's the game of the name
>Convincing people
>Convincing people
>There's several ways
>There's several ways
>To convince people
>And there's several days
>And there's never a way
>To convince people
>
>There's one way though
>That you'll never convince people
>And that's when you try
>To be someone
>Who's not telling
>And who's not trying to compel
>Who's trying to tell you
>What you ought to be
>Convinced of
>
>http://brainwashed.com/tg/people.html
>
>`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
>
>+ tripe
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Max Herman wrote:
> My mind goes back to a girl I knew some years ago, who told me "Hold on
> loosely but don't let go. If you cling too tightly you're gonna lose
> control." Your baby needs someone to believe in, and a whole lotta space to
> breathe in.
Which is meaningless drivel. Nor does that girl's saying relate to
what I do in any way.
> So for those who wonder if Karei and I are friends,
Don't flatter yourself, baby. Nobody expressed any interest in
friendship.
> he can can go hard to fucking hell.
How sweet. Too bad things don't work that way.
> Express elevator goin' down.
Right.
> He had to take back his assertion that "Madonna is powerful."
Did I? You're the one stuck in your flat myopic treatment of language.
It's your own problem.
Logic is always wrong.
> So, if you want him to suffer,
How sweet of you. But that isn't going to cause me any suffering.
Yet again, you are a sadistic bully–Max Dearest.
> stick that in his face.
Try to get to my first. Slug.
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>:
> On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Max Herman wrote:
>
> > So for those who wonder if Karei and I are friends,
>
> Don't flatter yourself, baby. Nobody expressed any interest in
> friendship.
I said I was your friend.
RESPOND TO ME
Joseph
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
> I said I was your friend.
This was not written to you.
Are you Max Herman now?
> RESPOND TO ME
Wag your tail again?
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
>
> > I said I was your friend.
>
> This was not written to you.
> Are you Max Herman now?
Yes, I am him, he is me, we are you, you are we.
>
>
> > RESPOND TO ME
>
> Wag your tail again?
RESPOND TO ME
joseph
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
> Yes, I am him, he is me, we are you, you are we.
Uh no. Keep your delusional amoeba interpretations of reality to
yourself. You are not me, Max Herman is not me, nor is there a 'we'
with regards to him and you. All you are doing is ego-inflating
+ projection attempt.
> RESPOND TO ME
Wag your tail again?
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
>
> > Yes, I am him, he is me, we are you, you are we.
>
> Uh no. Keep your delusional amoeba interpretations of reality to
> yourself. You are not me, Max Herman is not me, nor is there a 'we'
> with regards to him and you. All you are doing is ego-inflating
> + projection attempt.
>
> > RESPOND TO ME
>
> Wag your tail again?
Marijuana simulates the conditions of perfect and pure bodiless contemplation,
because the alkaloid stuns the nervous centers, but panic is caused, by the
poison, to overcome peace and sense of rest. So natural contemplation induced
by serious self disciplinary trance methods is far better.
Remove all attachements to the body save refreshing food and beverage, even if
the attachment has for its purpose the disembodying effect so desirable to the
tranquil mediator.
JK SOD
RESPOND TO ME
Joseph
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
> Marijuana simulates the conditions of perfect and pure bodiless contemplation,
> because the alkaloid stuns the nervous centers, but panic is caused, by the
> poison, to overcome peace and sense of rest. So natural contemplation induced
> by serious self disciplinary trance methods is far better.
> Remove all attachements to the body save refreshing food and beverage,
> even if the attachment has for its purpose the disembodying effect
> so desirable to the tranquil mediator.
Wag your tail again?
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42
Quoting "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
>
> > Marijuana simulates the conditions of perfect and pure bodiless
> contemplation,
> > because the alkaloid stuns the nervous centers, but panic is caused, by the
> > poison, to overcome peace and sense of rest. So natural contemplation
> induced
> > by serious self disciplinary trance methods is far better.
>
> > Remove all attachements to the body save refreshing food and beverage,
> > even if the attachment has for its purpose the disembodying effect
> > so desirable to the tranquil mediator.
>
> Wag your tail again?
I lost it before birth.
RESPOND TO ME.
Joseph
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 joseph@electrichands.com wrote:
> > Wag your tail again?
>
> I lost it before birth.
How did that happen?
`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42