well,
an ancient nenette shaman knows,

rmrmmmmmmmmm.
kandinsky knows i guess.

–
OG
-/ and now, back to our "finger in the bounioule" programme ! /-

—– Original Message —–
From: "Pet Name" <muserna@muserna.org>
To: "-IID42 Kandinskij @27+" <death@zaphod.terminal.org>; <list@rhizome.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 12:41 AM
Subject: RHIZOME_RAW: bomber beuys


> on 9/9/02 9:45 AM, -IID42 Kandinskij @27+ death@zaphod.terminal.org ecrit
:
>
> > Surviving the devastation of World War II, Beuys […]
>
>
> I thought that was'nt proven & It was only a myth?? Anyone know bout this?
>
>
> -muserna
>
> + If the reader will keep me company I shall be glad.
> -> post: list@rhizome.org
> -> questions: info@rhizome.org
> -> subscribe/unsubscribe: http://rhizome.org/preferences/subscribe.rhiz
> -> give: http://rhizome.org/support
> +
> Subscribers to Rhizome are subject to the terms set out in the
> Membership Agreement available online at http://rhizome.org/info/29.php
>

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Pet Name wrote:

> > Surviving the devastation of World War II, Beuys […]
>
>
> I thought that was'nt proven & It was only a myth?? Anyone know bout this?

I've no idea–but also I suspect we have a different attitude towards
'myths'–maybe. Especially since proofs are not a valid path of
discerning reality–and a rather awry, 'cheap' substitute for
verification–if this makes sense to you.


`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, clement Thomas wrote:

> well,
> an ancient nenette shaman knows,

yep.

> rmrmmmmmmmmm.
> kandinsky knows i guess.

yep. and i'm not telling.
slighting stances are not 'humorous'
I like my humor real, not debasing or cowardly.

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42