Mukul the person claiming to be the past/ present and future collaborator of nungu is really her boyfriend. Even he has gotten confused that nungu = bea {in a digital manefestation}. He is thus repeating his wows to Bea, for nungu also. That’s really sweet of him. Only, he doesn’t realize that he is supporting a wrong cause.

I and only I (besides bea) have been mentioned as a nungu member since the defunct first version. Mukul and Laura should wonder why this privilege was never offered to them if they have been collaborators throughout. They do not find a mention in the new resume as well.

More lies will only work against Bea. Boyfriends and close pals of Bea should note this.

Is it ethical to mention boyfriends, pets, dependent employees, deceased family members etc as collaborators just to make it seem like nungu is a collective?

Who were the collective members when the grant application was made? Can they write to this list and reveal their mysterious identities? Why does the proposal not mention them? Are they that insignificant? Why is Bea the only grant beneficiary mentioned in the proposal? Do the other collective members want none of it? Why do they want to remain anonymous collaborators who want to work for free even when a grant is being awarded?



A reply to Mukuls assertions:

>So, anybody claiming that:


>1)he or she could have been solely responsible for a >project
>2)nungu offered free hosting to artists (this is a >ridiculous concept, why would anyone do such a thing?)
>3)the nungu collective has disbanded (who is implementing >the commissions, what the hell am I doing?)

>is a blatant liar, nothing more, nothing less.

1) If none can claim sole credit for any nungu project, then that applies for Bea as well. She has accepted as much that I was also the co-author of Mrs. Jeevan Jham. Then how can she start building on it on her own?

2) If nungu did not offer its web space for free, then has it received payment from any artist to host their work online? If so, please mention the amount received and some proof of that transaction.

No one will ever pay to have their work hosted on a website, if they did it would be ridiculous.

I never paid nungu for the exposure it offered me and I was never paid for any of my contributions as I was never an employee but a contributing artist.

Several art organisations offer various benefits to artists for free. nungu offering its web space for free is not a ridiculous concept at all, but a fact – it is its very basis for existence. Mukul this is not your corporate world, things work very differently out here.

3) If other artists besides Bea are collaborating on the proposed project, why have they not been mentioned in the proposal? And why is Bea mentioned as the sole beneficiary of the grant in the proposal (see budget section of the proposal)?

And yes, what the hell are you doing with nungu? You should be in your dad's office or the plastic factory, working hard to repay the debts the corporation is under.