Re: FW: question

In a message dated 7/15/2002 8:57:20 AM Central Daylight Time,
Cora_Roelofs@dfci.harvard.edu writes:


> You were dangerous 15 yrs ago

Sorry to bother you Cora, and I won't again, but you really thought I was
dangerous, and that I have a cult? The cult part I can see but the dangerous
leaves me confused. G2K is all pretty basic Frankfurt School stuff, and more
or less establishment net.art now. Plus I vote Nader.

Anyhow, best wishes, and hopes for energy without externalities,

Max Herman
genius2000.net

++

marc garrett July 15 2002 01:00Reply

I always thought that harvard education was an elitist cult…

marc


In a message dated 7/15/2002 8:57:20 AM Central Daylight Time, Cora_Roelo=
fs@dfci.harvard.edu writes:



You were dangerous 15 yrs ago


Sorry to bother you Cora, and I won't again, but you really thought I was=
dangerous, and that I have a cult? The cult part I can see but the danger=
ous leaves me confused. G2K is all pretty basic Frankfurt School stuff, an=
d more or less establishment net.art now. Plus I vote Nader.

Anyhow, best wishes, and hopes for energy without externalities,

Max Herman
genius2000.net

++

Max Herman July 15 2002 01:00Reply

In a message dated 7/15/2002 8:14:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
info@furtherfield.org writes:


> You were dangerous 15 yrs ago

17 and dangerous already, that's precocity.

marc garrett July 15 2002 01:00Reply

Some people cannot let others change…

marc


In a message dated 7/15/2002 8:14:43 PM Central Daylight Time, info@furth=
erfield.org writes:



You were dangerous 15 yrs ago


17 and dangerous already, that's precocity.

marc garrett July 15 2002 01:00Reply

When I was a nipper - I was always getting in trouble. Especially when fron=
ting punk/electro bands on stage, getting drunkl and all…times change tho=
ugh. Now I'm getting in trouble in other ways that are less concerned with =
demolition…

marc


In a message dated 7/15/2002 8:14:43 PM Central Daylight Time, info@furth=
erfield.org writes:



You were dangerous 15 yrs ago


17 and dangerous already, that's precocity.

Max Herman Oct. 29 2002 01:00Reply

If G2K could poop on the Bush takeover, would that be good, or would it be
immoral for me to try? Would it be immoral for me not to try?

Cause see it would only take a day or two to start a real culturospiritual
revolution in humans, time enough to keep the Senate Democrat, leaving one
big blockage to the NRA agenda. Then we can kick Saddam's butt culturally
and bring peace to the middle east culturally, not the other gross and
violent undemocratic unconstitutional way.

I know hustlers rule, and all the hustlers hate G2K because it throws out
the baby with the bathtub, but the bathtub leaks, and the baby might not be
such a baby after all anyway.

If I was a conservative strategist for Bush and his crew, I'd want everyone
to think that the world will die if he doesn't get to invade Iraq and so
forth. Of course the average sloppy dildo conscientious type will think
that it all will collapse–for example, with legit accounting the Dow goes
to like 6000.

Personally I can go either way. It's not my fuckin responsibility at this
point. It's up to you jokers, you and your soul, to decide. For lack of a
nail a shoe was lost.

Yes my book will be done and ready on Jan. 1, but anyone who waits on G2K
for that is a bad bad sinner. Something killed my senator last Friday and
that's shitty.

_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid963

D42 Kandinskij Oct. 30 2002 01:00Reply

On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Max Herman wrote:

Dunno Max–why dontcha stop pretending like you're doing earnest, honest,
'artwork'?

`, . ` `k a r e i' ? ' D42